Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 7.0 Nougat | Android 10 |
| 2017-07-01 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.00 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Rose gold and Silver | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.48 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a global score of 81.1, which is better than the Galaxy J7 (2017)'s 73.5 score. Even though Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is noticeably newer than the Galaxy J7 (2017), it's thicker and heavier. These phones come with Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has older 10 version and Galaxy J7 (2017) has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy J7 (2017), because although it has a little lower display density, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a bigger display. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has 3 GB more RAM.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a very superior storage for games and applications than Galaxy J7 (2017), because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro captures much better photos and videos than Galaxy J7 (2017), because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels and a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a much better battery performance than Galaxy J7 (2017), because it has a 39 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.