Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.5 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x |
| 2018-07-13 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Black | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 230.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has a global score of 93.2, which is way better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018)'s 72.5 general score. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max's design is incredibly newer and somewhat thinner, but also notably heavier than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018). Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a much sharper display than Galaxy J7 (2018), because it has a larger screen, a way higher resolution of 1284 x 2778 pixels and a way greater number of pixels per display inch.
IPhone 13 Pro Max features a very superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), because although it has 2 less cores , it also counts with more RAM memory and a 64-bits processor. The iPhone 13 Pro Max features a little bit more memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage capacity.
IPhone 13 Pro Max features superior battery duration than Galaxy J7 (2018), because it has a 4352mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max captures slightly better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), because although it has a camera in the back with lesser mega pixels, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture and a much higher video resolution.
Although Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy J7 (2018), and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy J7 (2018). If you want to save some money, you can get the Galaxy J7 (2018), and give up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.