Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.5 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 9.x |
| 2018-07-13 | 2015-09-09 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic | Aluminium, Glass and Steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 230.00 | $ 575.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 750 x 1334 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Apple A9 APL0898 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 1715mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 240 hours standby time 14 hours talk time |
| 5.28 | 3.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 6s is much better than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), having a general score of 83 against 72.5. Despite of the fact that the Apple iPhone 6s is a lot older than the Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), it's construction is extremely lighter and thinner. The iPhone 6s counts with a much sharper display than Galaxy J7 (2018), because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit greater count of pixels per screen inch and a bit higher 1334 x 750px resolution.
IPhone 6s features just a bit more memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Apple iPhone 6s has a better CPU than Galaxy J7 (2018), because although it has an inferior number of cores , and they both have a 2 GB RAM, the Apple iPhone 6s also counts with a 64 bits processor and a graphics co-processor.
The Apple iPhone 6s shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), because although it has a much smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for taking photographs and video in poorly lited environments and a back camera with less megapixels, it also counts with a way higher video resolution and a larger sensor capturing higher quality photos and videos.
The Galaxy J7 (2018) has a really longer battery life than iPhone 6s, because it has a 92 percent more battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone 6s is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy J7 (2018), and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy J7 (2018). So if you want that extra features, you can buy Apple iPhone 6s, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Galaxy J7 (2018), letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.