Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.5 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| 2018-07-13 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 230.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X is a lot better than Galaxy J7 (2018), with a global score of 88.1 against 72.5. IPhone X is a a bit lighter and thinner phone than the Galaxy J7 (2018), even when both were released only a few months apart. IPhone X counts with a lot better screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), because it has a bit larger display, way more pixels per screen inch and a much higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels.
The Apple iPhone X has a better performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a higher amount of RAM memory and a 64-bits CPU. The Apple iPhone X has much more memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy J7 (2018), because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018) has longer battery life than iPhone X, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity against 2716mAh. The iPhone X takes much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), because although it has a camera in the back with less mega-pixels resolution and a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light photography and videos, it also counts with a much higher (4K) video definition and a bigger camera sensor which gives a higher image and video quality.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018). If you are trying to save some money, you can get the Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), and give up a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.