Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.5 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| 2018-07-13 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 230.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XR is much better than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), having a score of 82 against 72.5. IPhone XR's design is just a little bit heavier but a little thinner than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), and they were released only a couple months apart. The Apple iPhone XR counts with a quite better processing power than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), because although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster), it also counts with more RAM memory and a 64-bit processing unit.
IPhone XR features a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), because it has a just a little higher pixels density, a quite larger screen and a better resolution of 828 x 1792. The Apple iPhone XR has a much better camera than Galaxy J7 (2018), because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light images and a less mega-pixels back-facing camera, it also counts with a much better video resolution and a larger back camera sensor which offers a better photo and video quality.
The Galaxy J7 (2018) features much more memory to install applications and games than iPhone XR, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 400 GB. Galaxy J7 (2018) counts with a little better battery performance than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
Although iPhone XR is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy J7 (2018), and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy J7 (2018). So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the iPhone XR, else you can save some money and buy the Galaxy J7 (2018), resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.