Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.5 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2018-07-13 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 230.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 has a general score of 80, which is much better than the Galaxy J7 (2018)'s 72.5 global score. Although Google Pixel 3 and Galaxy J7 (2018) were only released with a few months difference, Google Pixel 3 is somewhat lighter and a bit thinner. The Google Pixel 3 has a bit better processing power than Galaxy J7 (2018), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 3 also has 2 GB more RAM.
Google Pixel 3 has a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Google Pixel 3 also has a much higher 1080 x 2160 resolution and a lot more pixels per inch of display. Google Pixel 3 counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy J7 (2018), because although it has a camera in the back with a worse resolution and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for taking photographs in low-light situations, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution and a bigger sensor providing a better image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018) features a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 3, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds up to 400 GB. Galaxy J7 (2018) counts with just a bit longer battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Google Pixel 3 is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.