Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.5 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2018-07-13 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Black | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 230.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 has a score of 89, which is a lot better than Galaxy J7 (2018)'s 72.5 score. The Google Pixel 5 is a noticeably newer cellphone, and it's also a little bit thinner and lighter than Galaxy J7 (2018). The Google Pixel 5 has just a bit better processing power than Galaxy J7 (2018), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 5 counts with a better looking display than Galaxy J7 (2018), because it has a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2340, a quite larger display and a way greater pixel density. The Google Pixel 5 takes better videos and photos than Galaxy J7 (2018), because although it has a lesser megapixels back camera, and they both have a F1.7 camera aperture, the Google Pixel 5 also counts with a bigger sensor taking better quality videos and photos and a way better (4K) video quality.
The Google Pixel 5 has a bit more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory. Google Pixel 5 counts with greater battery lifetime than Galaxy J7 (2018), because it has 4080mAh of battery capacity.
Google Pixel 5 costs a lot more than Galaxy J7 (2018), but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.