Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2018-07-13 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 230.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.73 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G7 Fit has a general score of 77, which is slightly better than Galaxy J7 (2018)'s overall score of 72.5. Even when the LG G7 Fit and the Galaxy J7 (2018) were only released with a couple of months difference, the LG G7 Fit is just a little bit thinner and lighter. LG G7 Fit counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Galaxy J7 (2018), because it has a much greater quantity of pixels per inch of screen, a little bit bigger screen and a lot better 1440 x 3120 resolution.
LG G7 Fit features a bit better CPU than Galaxy J7 (2018), because although it has less processing cores , it also counts with a higher amount of RAM. LG G7 Fit counts with a way bigger memory for apps and games than Galaxy J7 (2018), and although they both have the same internal storage, the LG G7 Fit also has an external memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy J7 (2018) has a bit superior battery lifetime than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 10% bigger battery size. The LG G7 Fit takes slightly better pictures and videos than Galaxy J7 (2018), because although it has a smaller back camera sensor taking less light and duller colors and a much smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for capturing pictures and video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a camera in the back with a better 16 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.