Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2018-07-13 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 230.00 | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G7 ThinQ is much better than the Galaxy J7 (2018), having a score of 81 against 72.5. LG G7 ThinQ is a lighter and just a little bit thinner phone than Galaxy J7 (2018), even when they were only released 1 months apart. The LG G7 ThinQ counts with a little faster CPU than Galaxy J7 (2018), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG G7 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
LG G7 ThinQ features a way better looking display than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), because it has a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3120, a lot more pixels per inch in the display and a bit bigger display. LG G7 ThinQ shoots better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), because although it has a smaller back camera sensor capturing less light and duller colors, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to take better photography and videos in low light situations, a much higher video definition and a higher 16 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
The LG G7 ThinQ counts with a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy J7 (2018), because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018) has a bit superior battery duration than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
LG G7 ThinQ is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.