Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.5 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Plastic | Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 230.00 | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 8.73 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.1 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V10 has a score of 78.6, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018)'s overall score of 72.5. LG V10 is a just a little bit heavier phone than the Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), but both of them are equally thin. Galaxy J7 (2018) counts with just a little better performance than LG V10, because although it has less RAM, it also counts with a higher number of cores.
The LG V10 has a much sharper display than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), because it has a lot better pixels amount per inch of display, a little bigger display and a way higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution. The LG V10 shoots much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low light captures and videos, it also counts with a larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a back facing camera with more mega-pixels and a much higher video resolution.
LG V10 counts with a lot bigger storage to install applications and games than Galaxy J7 (2018), because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018) counts with just a bit better battery performance than LG V10, because it has a 10 percent bigger battery size.
The LG V10 costs more than the Galaxy J7 (2018), but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.