Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.5 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| 2018-07-13 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 230.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is much better than the Galaxy J7 (2018), with an 81.3 score against 72.5. The LG V35 ThinQ design is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than Galaxy J7 (2018), even though they were released only 1 months apart. The LG V35 ThinQ has a greater processing power than Galaxy J7 (2018), and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has more RAM.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much more vibrant screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), because it has a bit bigger screen, a lot greater pixel amount per inch of display and a lot better 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution. LG V35 ThinQ features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor capturing worse quality pictures and videos, it also counts with a better 16 MP resolution back-facing camera, a bigger camera aperture for better photography and videos in low light environments and a way better (4K) video resolution.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy J7 (2018), because it has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal storage. LG V35 ThinQ has a battery life that's just as good as the battery life in Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018).
LG V35 ThinQ costs a little more money than the Galaxy J7 (2018), but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.