Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.5 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Black | Blue and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 230.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 9.13 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ is a lot better than Galaxy J7 (2018), with a global score of 87.6 against 72.5. Although the LG V60 ThinQ is newer than Galaxy J7 (2018), it is a little thicker and heavier. LG V60 ThinQ has a greater performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), because it has more pixels per inch in the display, a bigger screen and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels. LG V60 ThinQ captures much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy J7 (2018), because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution, a back facing camera with a much higher 64 mega-pixels resolution and a lot bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a superior memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. LG V60 ThinQ counts with a very superior battery life than Galaxy J7 (2018), because it has a 52% larger battery capacity.
LG V60 ThinQ is way more expensive than Galaxy J7 (2018), but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.