Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.5 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Black | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 230.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Wing has a general score of 91.2, which is a lot better than Galaxy J7 (2018)'s 72.5 general score. The LG Wing construction is noticeably newer, but notably heavier and incredibly thicker than the Galaxy J7 (2018). The LG Wing counts with just a bit better processing power than Galaxy J7 (2018), and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG Wing also has a higher amount of RAM.
LG Wing features a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), because it has a greater pixel density, a bigger screen and a much better 1080 x 2460 pixels resolution. The LG Wing counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy J7 (2018), because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and videos, it also counts with a lot bigger sensor which offers a much higher image and video quality, a much more megapixels camera and a way higher 3840x2160 video quality.
The LG Wing features a way bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy J7 (2018), because it has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 256 GB internal storage capacity. The LG Wing features greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018). If you want to save some dollars, you can get the Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.