Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.5 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black | Interstellar Black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 230.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), getting an 83.4 score against 72.5. Motorola Edge 40 Pro's design has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), but it is a little heavier. The Galaxy J7 (2018) has a much better performing processing unit than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a much more vibrant display than Galaxy J7 (2018), because it has a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a higher display pixel density and a larger screen. Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy J7 (2018), because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro shoots way better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low light images and video, it also counts with a much bigger sensor, a much better 50 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a much better video quality.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a very superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), because it has a 4600mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.