Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.5 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 230.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is much better than the Galaxy J7 (2018), getting an 87.1 score against 72.5. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's body has the same thickness than the Galaxy J7 (2018), but it's just a bit heavier. The Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018) counts with a much faster processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 10 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a way better display than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), because it has a larger display, a way higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and more pixels per inch in the screen. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much greater storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy J7 (2018), because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 480 GB more internal memory.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a greater camera than Galaxy J7 (2018), because it has a back camera with lot more mega-pixels, a larger aperture for better captures in low light environments, a lot better (4K) video definition and a much larger camera sensor which gives a lot higher photo and video quality.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.