Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.5 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2018-07-13 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 230.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Zoom is much better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), with a global score of 80 against 72.5. Motorola One Zoom's body is newer, but a little bit heavier and a little thicker than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018). The Motorola One Zoom counts with a bit faster processor than Galaxy J7 (2018), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Motorola One Zoom also has more RAM.
Motorola One Zoom features a much better looking display than Galaxy J7 (2018), because it has a bigger display, a lot better number of pixels per display inch and a much higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution. The Motorola One Zoom counts with a way better camera than Galaxy J7 (2018), and although they both have a same size aperture, the Motorola One Zoom also has a lot larger sensor providing a lot better image quality, a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a back camera with lot more megapixels.
The Motorola One Zoom counts with a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), because although it has an external memory card slot that supports 272 GB smaller, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage. Motorola One Zoom counts with greater battery lifetime than Galaxy J7 (2018), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Although Motorola One Zoom is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy J7 (2018), and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy J7 (2018). If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy Galaxy J7 (2018), and give up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.