Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.5 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 230.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is much better than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), getting a overall score of 87 against 72.5. The Motorola razr (2020) is a noticeably newer and a bit thinner phone than the Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), but it is just a little heavier. The Motorola razr (2020) has a better screen than Galaxy J7 (2018), because it has a bit larger display, a better amount of pixels per screen inch and a much better resolution of 876 x 2142px.
The Motorola razr (2020) features a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy J7 (2018), because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Motorola razr (2020) features just a bit better performance than Galaxy J7 (2018), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy J7 (2018), and although they both have a same size aperture, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a way larger back camera sensor, a way better resolution camera and a way better video quality. Galaxy J7 (2018) features longer battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has an 18 percent bigger battery size.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy J7 (2018), and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy J7 (2018). If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy Galaxy J7 (2018), letting go a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.