Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.5 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Black | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 230.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | -- |
| 267 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Nokia XR20 has a global score of 80.8, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018)'s global score of 72.5. Even though the Nokia XR20 is noticeably newer than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), it is a lot heavier and somewhat thicker. Nokia XR20 has a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Nokia XR20 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Nokia XR20 has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), because it has a larger display, a way better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a higher count of pixels per inch of screen. Nokia XR20 shoots better photographs and videos than Galaxy J7 (2018), because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light photography and videos, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Nokia XR20 also counts with a much larger sensor, a lot more mega pixels camera and better 60 fps video frame rates.
Nokia XR20 counts with much more storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy J7 (2018), because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. Nokia XR20 has a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), because it has a 4630mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
Although Nokia XR20 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy J7 (2018), and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy J7 (2018). If you want to save some money, you can get Galaxy J7 (2018), and give up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.