Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.5 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2018-07-13 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 230.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 has a general score of 90.7, which is a lot better than Galaxy J7 (2018)'s general score of 72.5. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A52 is a bit heavier than the Galaxy J7 (2018), it's just a little thinner and notably newer. The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a brighter display than Galaxy J7 (2018), because it has a bigger screen, a much better 1080 x 2400 resolution and way more pixels per display inch.
The Galaxy A52 features a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy A52 also has more RAM. The Galaxy A52 shoots greater photos and videos than Galaxy J7 (2018), because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for capturing photos and/or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a back camera with a way higher 64 MP resolution, a much larger sensor and a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution.
Galaxy A52 has a much better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), because it has a 36 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.