Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.5 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-07-13 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 230.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A70 is slightly better than the Galaxy J7 (2018), with a 76.9 score against 72.5. Even though the Galaxy A70 is a little bit heavier than the Galaxy J7 (2018), it's just a little bit thinner and also newer. Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 features a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), because it has a bigger display, a way better 1080 x 2400 resolution and more pixels per inch in the display. Galaxy A70 features much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy A70 has superior battery life than Galaxy J7 (2018), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy J7 (2018) takes much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a tinier camera sensor which gives a lower photo and video quality, they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same (Full HD) video quality and the same aperture.
Samsung Galaxy A70 is more expensive than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.