Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.5 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2018-07-13 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 230.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 267 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 is way better than Galaxy J7 (2018), having a general score of 90.8 against 72.5. The Galaxy Note 20 design is noticeably newer and just a little bit thinner than Galaxy J7 (2018)'s, although it's also a bit heavier. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), because it has a greater display pixels density, a larger display and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
Galaxy Note 20 features a slightly bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Galaxy Note 20 counts with a better performing processor than Galaxy J7 (2018), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Note 20 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy Note 20 has better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), because it has a 4300mAh battery size against 3300mAh. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a superior camera than Galaxy J7 (2018), because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for low light photography and a camera in the back with lesser MP, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition and a lot bigger camera sensor which offers a lot better photo and video quality.
Although Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy J7 (2018), and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy J7 (2018). So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Galaxy Note 20, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Galaxy J7 (2018), resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.