Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.5 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 230.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way better than Galaxy J7 (2018), with a 98.9 score against 72.5. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's design is way newer and a little thinner than Galaxy J7 (2018)'s, although it is somewhat heavier. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a better CPU than Galaxy J7 (2018), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), because it has a much better 1440 x 3088px resolution, a larger screen and way more pixels per display inch. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy J7 (2018), because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a lot larger sensor shooting much better quality videos and pictures, a much higher video definition and a way more mega pixels back facing camera.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1000 GB and more internal memory. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has longer battery performance than Galaxy J7 (2018), because it has a 36 percent larger battery size.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy J7 (2018), but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.