Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.5 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 230.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot better than the Galaxy J7 (2018), getting a 98 score against 72.5. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a newer device than Galaxy J7 (2018), although it is heavier and a little thicker. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a greater processing power than Galaxy J7 (2018), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much more vibrant display than Galaxy J7 (2018), because it has a way higher 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution, a lot better pixel density and a larger screen. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a very superior camera than Galaxy J7 (2018), because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low light photography and videos, it also counts with a way more MP back facing camera, a lot bigger back camera sensor taking lot better quality photos and a lot better video definition.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much greater storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), because it has more internal storage and an external memory slot that holds up to 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a really longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018). If you are trying to save some money, you can buy Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), and give up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.