Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.5 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 230.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a score of 95.4, which is way better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018)'s overall score of 72.5. The Galaxy S22 Ultra is a way newer cellphone than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), although it is a little thicker and noticeably heavier. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a little bit better processing power than Galaxy J7 (2018), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much sharper screen than Galaxy J7 (2018), because it has a way better screen density, a way better 1440 x 3088 resolution and a bigger screen. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a lot better camera than Galaxy J7 (2018), because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light captures and video, it also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video definition, a much larger camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and pictures and a camera in the back with a much higher 108 megapixels resolution.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a little bit more storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy J7 (2018), because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much longer battery life than Galaxy J7 (2018), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018). So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Galaxy S22 Ultra, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.