Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black | Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 230.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a global score of 81, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018)'s 72.5 general score. The Galaxy XCover Pro construction is newer than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018)'s, but it is somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier. The Galaxy XCover Pro has a more vivid display than Galaxy J7 (2018), because it has a much greater display density, a little bit larger screen and a much better 1080 x 2340 resolution.
The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a little better performance than Galaxy J7 (2018), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy XCover Pro has much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy J7 (2018), because it has 64 GB internal memory and a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro captures clearer videos and photos than Galaxy J7 (2018), because although it has a way tinier camera sensor which gives a much lower image and video quality, and they both have the same video frame rate, a same size camera aperture and the same (Full HD) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a camera in the back with a much better resolution.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with greater battery life than Galaxy J7 (2018), because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Galaxy XCover Pro is a lot more expensive than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.