Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.5 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 230.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is way better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), having a 92.3 score against 72.5. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is just a little heavier than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), it's thinner and also notably newer. Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), because it has a much higher number of pixels per inch in the display, a bigger screen and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a more powerful CPU than Galaxy J7 (2018), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G captures much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for shooting images and/or video in poorly lited situations and a back camera with a worse 12 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger sensor and a lot higher 3840x2160 video quality.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a battery duration that's very similar to the battery duration in Galaxy J7 (2018).
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G costs a lot more than the Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), but it's still a great deal, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.