Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| -- | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.04 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G71 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 is just a bit better than Galaxy J7 Duo, getting an 80 score against 74.6. The Google Pixel 3 is a just a little bit thinner and lighter device than Galaxy J7 Duo. Google Pixel 3 counts with a sharper screen than Galaxy J7 Duo, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Google Pixel 3 also has a way better 1080 x 2160 pixels resolution and a lot higher pixel density.
The Google Pixel 3 features a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy J7 Duo. They have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores. Google Pixel 3 has a bit better camera than Galaxy J7 Duo, because although it has a back facing camera with lesser MP resolution, it also counts with a way higher (4K) video resolution, a bigger back camera sensor capturing higher quality photos and videos and a bigger diafragm aperture.
The Samsung Galaxy J7 Duo has more storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 256 GB. The Galaxy J7 Duo features a bit superior battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.