Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| -- | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.04 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G71 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Duo, getting a general score of 80.7 against 74.6. The Google Pixel 3 XL is a just a little bit heavier but just a little bit thinner cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Duo. The Google Pixel 3 XL has a way better looking display than Galaxy J7 Duo, because it has a lot more pixels per inch of screen, a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px and a little bit larger display.
Galaxy J7 Duo features a quite bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB. Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a little faster CPU than Galaxy J7 Duo. They have 4 GB of RAM and the same number of cores.
The Google Pixel 3 XL has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy J7 Duo, because although it has a lower 12.2 megapixels resolution camera, it also counts with a larger sensor, a bigger camera aperture to take better low light images and videos and a much better (4K) video definition. Google Pixel 3 XL has a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 Duo, because it has a 14% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.