Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| -- | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.04 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G71 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Duo, getting a global score of 81.9 against 74.6. The Google Pixel 4 design has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Duo, but it is just a bit lighter. Google Pixel 4 features a better looking display than Galaxy J7 Duo, because it has a little larger display, a lot better 1080 x 2280 resolution and a way better amount of pixels per inch of display.
Google Pixel 4 has a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy J7 Duo, and although they both have 8 cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has more RAM memory. The Google Pixel 4 shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy J7 Duo, because although it has a back facing camera with less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture, a larger sensor which offers a better photo and video quality and a lot higher video definition.
Samsung Galaxy J7 Duo counts with a greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 256 GB. The Samsung Galaxy J7 Duo counts with a little longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 7% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.