Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| -- | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.04 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Clearly white and Just black |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G71 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G is much better than Galaxy J7 Duo, getting an 87.5 score against 74.6. Google Pixel 4a 5G's construction has the same thickness than the Galaxy J7 Duo, but it is just a bit lighter. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (Operating System), but Google Pixel 4a 5G has the previous 11 version and Galaxy J7 Duo has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a much better display than Galaxy J7 Duo, because it has a much greater display pixels density, a much higher 1080 x 2340px resolution and a bit larger display. Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy J7 Duo, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has more RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a better camera than Galaxy J7 Duo, because although it has a lesser MP resolution camera, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture, a way better (4K) video definition and a larger back-facing camera sensor. The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy J7 Duo, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy J7 Duo, because it has a 30% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.