Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.04 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G71 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is a bit better than Galaxy J7 Duo, with a general score of 81.3 against 74.6. LG V35 ThinQ is a a bit thinner and just a bit lighter device than the Galaxy J7 Duo. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much sharper screen than Galaxy J7 Duo, because it has a little larger display, a lot higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and a way higher display density.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a little better hardware performance than Galaxy J7 Duo, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has more RAM. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a way bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy J7 Duo, because it has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal memory capacity.
LG V35 ThinQ has a superior camera than Galaxy J7 Duo, because although it has a smaller sensor, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture, a more mega-pixels camera and a way higher video definition. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little better battery duration than Galaxy J7 Duo, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.