Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 13 |
| -- | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.04 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Interstellar Black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G71 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 8.82 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro is better than Samsung Galaxy J7 Duo, with a score of 83.4 against 74.6. Although it's the best in our current comparison, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro body is just a bit thicker and heavier than Samsung Galaxy J7 Duo. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has 13 version and Samsung Galaxy J7 Duo has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a way better screen than Galaxy J7 Duo, because it has a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2400, a bigger display and a better pixels number in each inch of display. Samsung Galaxy J7 Duo has a much faster processing unit than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has 8 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a very superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy J7 Duo, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy J7 Duo, because it has a 4600mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy J7 Duo, because it has a much bigger sensor capturing lot better quality videos and pictures, a back facing camera with way more mega pixels, a lot better 7680x4320 video definition and a larger diafragm aperture for better captures in low light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.