Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| -- | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.04 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G71 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.82 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is much better than Galaxy J7 Duo, having a overall score of 87.1 against 74.6. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a just a bit thicker and somewhat heavier cellphone than Galaxy J7 Duo. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the older 14 version and Galaxy J7 Duo has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features an incredibly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy J7 Duo, because it has a larger display, a higher display density and a lot better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a way bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy J7 Duo, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy J7 Duo counts with a very superior processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy J7 Duo, because it has a lot higher video resolution, a much bigger sensor, a way more mega-pixels back camera and a larger aperture.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much better battery duration than Galaxy J7 Duo, because it has a 50% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.