Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.04 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G71 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is much better than Galaxy J7 Duo, with an 87 score against 74.6. Both phones we compare here have Android operating system, but Motorola razr (2020) has 11 version and Galaxy J7 Duo has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Motorola razr (2020)'s design is just a bit thinner but a little bit heavier than the Galaxy J7 Duo.
The Motorola razr (2020) features a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 Duo, because it has a greater pixels density, a lot higher resolution of 876 x 2142px and a little bit bigger display. Motorola razr (2020) counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy J7 Duo, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a higher amount of RAM.
Motorola razr (2020) features a very superior camera than Galaxy J7 Duo, because it has a lot larger sensor capturing way higher quality photographs and videos, a lot higher 48 MP resolution back-facing camera, a bigger camera aperture for better photography and video in low-light environments and a way higher 3840x2160 video definition.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy J7 Duo, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Galaxy J7 Duo has a bit superior battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.