Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.04 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G71 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an overall score of 98, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Duo's 74.6 general score. Despite being the best cellphone in this comparison, Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's construction is extremely heavier and just a little bit thicker than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Duo. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has 13 version while Samsung Galaxy J7 Duo has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a quite better processing power than Galaxy J7 Duo, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 8 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy J7 Duo, because it has a larger display, way more pixels per inch in the display and a much higher 1440 x 3200px resolution.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a lot bigger storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy J7 Duo, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy J7 Duo, because it has a larger aperture for better low light images and video, a lot better video quality, a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels and a much larger back camera sensor shooting lot better quality pictures and videos.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 Duo, because it has a 67% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.