Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | -- |
| 2017-06-20 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.17 x 3.10 x 0.32 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P20 MT6757 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 16 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP2 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS is much better than Galaxy J7 Max, with a general score of 84.2 against 76.1. IPhone XS's design is newer, just a little bit thinner and a little lighter than the Galaxy J7 Max. Apple iPhone XS features a superior processing power than Galaxy J7 Max, because although it has lesser cpu cores (but faster), and they both have the same RAM amount, the Apple iPhone XS also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
The Apple iPhone XS has a brighter display than Galaxy J7 Max, because it has a little bit higher screen pixels density, a slightly better resolution of 1125 x 2436 and a little bit bigger screen. Apple iPhone XS takes much better photos and videos than Galaxy J7 Max, because although it has a less MP camera and a tinier aperture which is worse for shooting photographs or video in low-light situations, it also counts with a way higher video definition.
Galaxy J7 Max counts with a better memory capacity to install games and applications than iPhone XS, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 256 GB. The Galaxy J7 Max has better battery lifetime than iPhone XS, because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.