Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | -- |
| 2017-06-20 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.17 x 3.10 x 0.32 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P20 MT6757 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 16 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Max, getting a score of 80 against 76.1. The Google Pixel 3 body is newer, just a bit thinner and lighter than Samsung Galaxy J7 Max. Google Pixel 3 counts with a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy J7 Max. They have 4 GB of RAM and the same number of cores.
The Google Pixel 3 features a little sharper screen than Galaxy J7 Max, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better screen pixels density and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2160px. Samsung Galaxy J7 Max has a quite bigger storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits up to 256 GB.
Google Pixel 3 counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy J7 Max, because although it has a worse resolution back camera and a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light images and video, it also counts with a much better (4K) video resolution. Galaxy J7 Max has a bit better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 2915mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.