Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | -- |
| 2017-06-20 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.17 x 3.10 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P20 MT6757 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 16 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a global score of 81.3, which is a little bit better than Galaxy J7 Max's score of 76.1. The LG V35 ThinQ construction is newer, just a bit thinner and lighter than the Galaxy J7 Max. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy J7 Max, because it has a better screen pixels density, a lot better 1440 x 2880px resolution and a little bigger screen.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit better CPU than Galaxy J7 Max, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy J7 Max, because it has a camera with a higher 16 mega pixels resolution, a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light captures and videos and a much better 3840x2160 video quality.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy J7 Max, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB and 32 GB more internal memory. LG V35 ThinQ's battery life is very similar to the Galaxy J7 Max one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.