Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | Android 14 |
| 2017-06-20 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.17 x 3.10 x 0.32 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P20 MT6757 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 16 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP2 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a general score of 87.1, which is much better than the Galaxy J7 Max's 76.1 global score. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has older 14 version and Galaxy J7 Max has Android 7.0 Nougat version. Although Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a lot newer than the Galaxy J7 Max, it is a bit thicker and a little bit heavier.
Samsung Galaxy J7 Max features a much better performing CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much more vibrant display than Galaxy J7 Max, because it has a larger display, a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit better amount of pixels per inch of screen.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Max, because it has a much better resolution camera in the back, a bigger camera aperture to take better captures in poorly lited environments and a lot better video quality. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features much more storage to install games and applications than Galaxy J7 Max, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features better battery performance than Galaxy J7 Max, because it has a 36% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.