Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | Android 12, 11 |
| 2017-06-20 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.17 x 3.10 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P20 MT6757 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 16 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP2 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a global score of 91.3, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Max's general score of 76.1. Both phones in this review come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has 12 version while Samsung Galaxy J7 Max has Android 7.0 Nougat version. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G's construction is a lot newer, but just a bit thicker and a bit heavier than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Max.
The Galaxy J7 Max and the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G feature incredibly similar CPUs, and although the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a greater amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Galaxy A52 5G features a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 Max, because it has a just a bit better screen pixels density, a quite bigger screen and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy J7 Max, because it has an external SD slot that admits up to 1 TB and more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G takes much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Max, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low light images, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video resolution and a camera in the back with a lot better resolution.
Galaxy A52 5G has improved battery performance than Galaxy J7 Max, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.