Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-06-20 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.17 x 3.10 x 0.32 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P20 MT6757 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 16 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a score of 97.6, which is much better than the Galaxy J7 Max's 76.1 general score. Samsung Galaxy Fold's construction is newer and somewhat thinner than the Galaxy J7 Max's, but it is notably heavier. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Fold has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while Galaxy J7 Max has Android 7.0 Nougat version.
Galaxy Fold counts with a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy J7 Max, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Fold also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy Fold features a screen that is very similar to Samsung Galaxy J7 Max's screen, because although the Galaxy Fold has a just a bit inferior count of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1536 x 2152 pixels and a larger display.
The Galaxy Fold shoots much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Max, because although it has a back camera with lesser mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture and a lot higher (4K) video quality. Galaxy Fold features much more memory to install applications and games than Galaxy J7 Max, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy Fold counts with better battery performance than Galaxy J7 Max, because it has a 33 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.