Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | -- |
| 2017-06-20 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.17 x 3.10 x 0.32 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Aluminum | Glass and Metal |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 386 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P20 MT6757 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 16 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is much better than Samsung Galaxy J7 Max, getting a global score of 89.7 against 76.1. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite's construction has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Max, but it is a little heavier. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 Max, because it has a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, a bigger screen and a just a bit more pixels per inch of display.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy J7 Max, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy S10 Lite shoots much better photographs and videos than Galaxy J7 Max, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low light images and video, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a lot higher 48 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Galaxy S10 Lite features much more storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy J7 Max, because it has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy S10 Lite counts with improved battery duration than Galaxy J7 Max, because it has a 36 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.