Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-06-20 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.17 x 3.10 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P20 MT6757 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 16 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way better than the Galaxy J7 Max, with a 94.6 score against 76.1. Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is noticeably heavier than Galaxy J7 Max, it's somewhat thinner and also notably newer. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS, but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an older 11 version while Galaxy J7 Max has Android 7.0 Nougat.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 Max, because although it has a just a little worse quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a lot larger screen and a higher 1768 x 2208 pixels resolution. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little better performance than Galaxy J7 Max, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy J7 Max, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with longer battery lifetime than Galaxy J7 Max, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy J7 Max, because although it has a tinier aperture and a back facing camera with a worse resolution, it also counts with a lot better video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.