Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | Android 10 |
| 2017-06-20 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.17 x 3.10 x 0.32 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P20 MT6757 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 16 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Max, having an 81.1 score against 76.1. These phones include Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy J7 Max has Android 7.0 Nougat version. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro design is notably newer than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Max's, although it is just a little thicker and somewhat heavier.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy J7 Max, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy J7 Max and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro both count with very similar screens, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a bit higher pixel count per screen inch and a bigger screen.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a much bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy J7 Max, because it has more internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a superior battery performance than Galaxy J7 Max, because it has a 52% greater battery capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro takes much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy J7 Max, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for capturing images or videos in low light environments, it also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels and a much better video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.