Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | -- |
| -- | 2018-09-21 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Rose gold | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS is much better than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, with an 84.2 score against 75.3. The iPhone XS body is just a bit thinner but a little heavier than the Galaxy J7 Prime 2. IPhone XS has a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has a quite better pixels density, a quite bigger display and a bit higher 1125 x 2436 resolution.
The Galaxy J7 Prime 2 counts with a bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone XS, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB. The Apple iPhone XS features a quite superior processing power than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster), it also counts with more RAM memory and a 64 bits processing unit.
The iPhone XS has a better camera than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because although it has a worse 12 mega pixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a larger camera sensor which provides a better image and video quality, a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photography and video and a lot higher video definition.
The Galaxy J7 Prime 2 has better battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a 24 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.