Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | -- |
| -- | 2016-10-20 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Rose gold | Black, Gray and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.73 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, with a global score of 80.2 against 75.3. The Google Pixel is a lighter but just a little thicker cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2. The Google Pixel has a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, the Google Pixel also counts with a little bit more pixels per screen inch.
Google Pixel counts with a little faster processing unit than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster), it also counts with 1 GB more RAM memory. The Google Pixel shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for low-light images and videos and a lower resolution camera, it also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot better quality videos and photos and a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution.
The Google Pixel counts with more memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2 features longer battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has a 19 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.