Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | -- |
| -- | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Rose gold | Black, Pink and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 has a score of 80, which is a bit better than the Galaxy J7 Prime 2's 75.3 general score. Google Pixel 3's body has the same thickness than the Galaxy J7 Prime 2, but it's somewhat lighter. The Google Pixel 3 has just a little better performance than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 3 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 3 has a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Google Pixel 3 also has a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a quite higher pixels density. Google Pixel 3 counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because although it has a less megapixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a much better (4K) video definition, a bigger sensor which gives a higher image and video quality and a larger camera aperture.
Galaxy J7 Prime 2 features a bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 256 GB. The Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2 has a bit superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity instead of 2915mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.