Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-07 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Rose gold | Black, Purple and White |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a is a bit better than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, getting a general score of 78.8 against 75.3. Google Pixel 3a is a a little bit thicker but somewhat lighter cellphone than Galaxy J7 Prime 2. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but Google Pixel 3a has an older 11 version and Galaxy J7 Prime 2 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Google Pixel 3a has a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2220px, a quite greater number of pixels in each inch in the display and a little bit bigger display. Google Pixel 3a counts with just a bit better processing power than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Google Pixel 3a also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 3a counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because although it has a back facing camera with less megapixels, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light captures, a bigger camera sensor shooting better quality pictures and videos and a lot better video definition.
Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2 has a better storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 256 GB. Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2 counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 10% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.