Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-20 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Rose gold | Just black |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a has a score of 82.9, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2's 75.3 general score. These phones work with Android operating system, but the Google Pixel 4a has older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Google Pixel 4a's design is a bit thicker but lighter than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2.
Google Pixel 4a features a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has a little bigger display, a just a little better pixel quantity per display inch and a quite better 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Google Pixel 4a features a bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Google Pixel 4a features a bit better CPU than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Google Pixel 4a also has a larger amount of RAM. The Google Pixel 4a features a little bit better camera than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because although it has a back-facing camera with less MP resolution, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution, a bigger sensor providing a higher image quality and a bigger aperture to capture better photography in poorly lited situations.
Galaxy J7 Prime 2 counts with just a bit better battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.