Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 11 |
| -- | 2020-11-19 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Rose gold | Clearly white and Just black |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is much better than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, getting a overall score of 87.5 against 75.3. The Google Pixel 4a 5G is a just a little lighter but a little bit thicker phone than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2. Both of these devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the Google Pixel 4a 5G has older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has a just a little better pixel density, a bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit larger screen. The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Google Pixel 4a 5G features just a bit better performance than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a much better camera than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because although it has a camera with a lower resolution, it also counts with a much higher (4K) video definition, a larger aperture for better photos and videos in low light situations and a larger back camera sensor capturing higher quality videos and photographs.
Google Pixel 4a 5G features longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has an 18 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.